|
@@ -268,7 +268,6 @@ The authors utilized two types of benchmarks:
|
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
|
\end{frame}
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
\begin{frame}
|
|
|
\frametitle{In-Memory Cold storage}
|
|
|
This analysis is done in order to isolate the overhead strictly caused by the Siberia framework, eliminating the latency of the I/O operations:
|
|
@@ -279,7 +278,6 @@ This analysis is done in order to isolate the overhead strictly caused by the Si
|
|
|
\end{figure}
|
|
|
\end{frame}
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
\begin{frame}
|
|
|
\frametitle{Migration}
|
|
|
This analysis instead focuses on the performance degradation of various types of workload during a live migration to the cold storage of parts of the database:
|